In order ot complete the task of volume calculations workers need the right tools, which will enable them to measure stockpiles accurately, safely and fast. Apart from the direct costs, we should also have in mind how much time we spend on the field instead of doing more profitable tasks and also workers sick leave due to bad weather conditions or dangerous situations. On the other hand, this tasks can even be extremely complex when you need to export the DXF data with boundary information of the desired area and importing it for volume calculation.Īll these challenges might lead to profit lose due to wrong calculations, penalties not meeting regulations, spending days on the field and still not being sure about accuracy, or even not being able to measure it is the pile includes dangerous waist. Unfortunately, all these methods have some common drawbacks and challenges, including inaccurate results, are time consuming (sometimes it takes days), a lot of time dangerous due to inaccessible areas and usually need several workers to achieve the task. This is a call to industries like Construction, Mining, Agriculture, Utility and similar ones that in order to complete their projects, need reliable, easy, fast, safe and especially accurate stock pile volume calculations business.Īs you might already know, traditional methods of volume calculations are walking wheel, truckload and bucket count method or the eyeballing method. bin file.Stockpile volume calculations fast, easy and accurate PD: i've tried to attach the cloudcompare file here but it says to me "invalid file extension" to the. If anyone could point me in the right direction for this i would appreciate it so much!!! I will post some photos of the model i'm talking about. I know this must be something i'm doing wrong, i see the potential of this tool and i really want to understand it. The second method is to take that segmented part with the stockpile and set a ground level by myself.Īnyway, the two methods with two different stockpiles it's giving me a volume 20-25% bigger than the real volume. I set this new raster ground as, exactly, ground level and compute with VOLUME 2.5D between the part cloud and the remaining rasterize cloud. That leave me with a ground that can copy any slope in the terrain. basically after segmentation i take the remaining part (the ground level), rasterize it with interpolation to fill the hole left by the segmentation. The first one is explained in this video. With all this done and checked i've segmented the cloud and tried to learn the volume with two methods. I have modified the scale of this models to match a reference in the scene with known dimensions. I've made photogrammetry models with a very good results in the mesh generated. To make the stockpiles i've used a precision scale a weighted water in a tea cup to know it's exact volume, then i filled up the cup with the materials and spread them in the floor to form the stockpile. I've tried two set ups with different materials. I've seen some similar issues but not exactly an answear to this. I am trying to validate cloudcompare with a homemade experiment for later use in an industrial enviroment.įirst of all i've had searched the forum with the keywords "stockpile volume" and i haven't found the answear to this. I'm new to this world of point clouds! I'm having a big trouble to achieve a volume calculation with the "volume 2.5D" of my stockpile.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |